Qualitative vs Quantitative Research: When to Use Each
User research is crucial for understanding the needs, preferences, and behaviours of your users. By directly engaging with and observing real users, you gain invaluable insights that can inform the design and development of your product or service.
There are two main approaches to conducting user research: qualitative and quantitative.
This article will provide an overview of qualitative vs quantitative research. I’ll define what each method is, walk through example scenarios of when you might use one versus the other, highlight the benefits of each, and offer guidelines on when qualitative or quantitative user research is most appropriate.
With a foundational understanding of these two complementary research approaches, you’ll be equipped to choose the right user research method(s) for gaining the insights you need.
Let’s get started.
Table of Contents
What is User Research?
User research is the study of target users and their needs, goals, and behaviours. It provides critical insights that inform the design and development of products, services, and experiences.
The goal of user research is to understand users’ motivations and thought processes so that solutions can be crafted to meaningfully address their pain points and desires. Researchers utilize various qualitative and quantitative techniques to uncover users’ attitudes, perceptions, and needs.
The findings from user research drive design decisions, product strategy, and business objectives. By grounding designs in real user data, teams can create solutions that delight users by meeting their needs. User research provides a profound understanding of the problem space so that products resonate with users’ mental models and workflows.
Qualitative User Research
Qualitative user research is a set of exploratory research techniques focused on developing a deep understanding of why and how people behave, think, feel, and make decisions.
It typically involves open-ended observations, interviews, and analysis based on small sample sizes.
The goal is to uncover insights into human motivations, attitudes and needs through immersive and conversational research methods.
Rather than focusing on quantitative metrics or measurements, qualitative user research aims to understand the nuanced human context surrounding products, services, and experiences.
Key characteristics of qualitative research include:
Asking open-ended questions –
Qualitative research utilizes flexible, open-ended questions that allow users to provide thoughtful and descriptive responses. Questions focus on the “why” and “how” behind bbehaviours not just surface-level preferences. For example, researchers may ask “Can you walk me through how you accomplished that task?” rather than “Did you find that task easy or difficult?”. Open questions lead to deeper psychological insights.
Small but focused sample sizes –
Qualitative studies recruit a smaller number of users, but they represent the target audience segment. For example, rather than 500 broadly targeted surveys, qualitative research may study 8-12 users who match the persona. Smaller samples enable more time spent discovering each user’s nuanced perspectives.
Naturalistic observations –
Qualitative research observes users interacting in real environments, like their homes or workplaces. This naturalistic approach reveals authentic behaviours versus what people say. Researchers can shadow users and see real-world contexts.
Immersive techniques –
Qualitative research utilizes ethnography-inspired techniques. Researchers embed themselves alongside users to empathize with their worldview. In-depth interviews, diary studies, and field visits all facilitate first-hand experience of the user’s journey – Through open and natural dialogue, qualitative research uncovers emotional and social insights difficult to extract via surveys or analytics. The human-to-human approach highlights feelings, relationships, and unarticulated needs.
Common Qualitative Research Methods
1. One-on-One Interviews
Conducting a one-on-one user interview involves an in-depth, conversational session between the researcher and a single user representative of the target audience. The interviewer guides the discussion using flexible, open-ended questions to elicit deep insights into the user’s perspectives, bebehavioursand needs.
One-on-one interviews shine when:
- Granular insights are needed from individuals based on their distinct circumstances and backgrounds.
- Understanding nuanced personal contexts, thought processes, pain points and emotions is critical.
- Users may be more forthcoming when peaking alone versus groups.
- The order and wording of questions benefit from real-time adaptation to the dialogue flow.
- Non-verbal cues and body language provide additional context to verbal answers.
Effective one-on-one interview tips include:
- Establishing rapport helps the user open up honestly. Avoid an interrogation vibe.
- Adapt questions based on responses, probing for richer details. Don’t just stick to a rigid script.
- Remain neutral and avoid leading questions that influence the user’s answers.
- Listen fully not just for what’s said but also what’s unspoken. Note emotions and inconsistencies.
- Thank the user for generously providing their time and perspectives. They feel valued.
One-on-one engagement allows deep discovery of individual motivations and contexts. It requires planning, active listening, and interpreting both verbal and non-verbal cues.
2. Focus Groups
A focus group brings together 6-12 users from the target audience for a moderated, interactive discussion focused on a product, service, or topic. Participants share perspectives and build on each other’s ideas in a conversational setting.
Focus groups are advantageous when:
- Real-time user interaction and feedback on concepts is desired.
- Sparking new ideas across users with different attitudes and behaviors is the goal.
- Observing how users influence each other reveals social dynamics and norms.
- A wider range of feedback is needed in the time available versus 1-on-1 interviews.
Tips for productive focus groups include:
- Recruit users who offer diverse perspectives but fit the target audience.
- Use a skilled, neutral moderator to facilitate constructive discussion and keep it on track.
- Explain ground rules upfront so all participants engage respectfully.
- Guide the flow from general to specific questions, leaving time for open discussion.
- Change up activities and stimuli (images, prototype demos) to sustain energy.
- Send recordings for further analysis of responses, interactions, and nonverbal behaviors.
3. User Diaries
User diaries involve having target audience members self-document and reflect on their experiences related to a product or service over time in an ongoing journal. Diary studies provide rich, longitudinal insights from the user’s perspective.
Diary studies are advantageous when:
- Capturing detailed, nuanced accounts of user journeys, motivations, pain points, and perceptions in a real-world context is needed.
- Users are geographically dispersed making direct observations or interviews impractical.
- Revealing changes over time rather than one-off interactions is the research goal.
- Users can clearly articulate their experiences through written or multimedia diaries.
Tips for productive diary studies include:
- Provide clear instructions and templates detailing what details to capture in diary entries over the study duration. Offer tools like written journals, audio recorders, or online forms.
- Set reasonable time commitments per day/week and study length based on depth required and user willingness.
- Check-in throughout the process to maintain participation, answer questions, and fix issues.
- Incentivize participation by compensating users for time spent journaling.
- Regularly review entries to identify compelling patterns and follow up for more context.
- Analyze entries to uncover key themes, insights, and opportunities related to the research aims.
Well-designed diary studies generate rich qualitative data by tapping into users’ direct experiences in their own words over time.
4. Ethnographic Studies
This involves immersing in users’ real-world environments to observe behaviors, understand contexts, and uncover unarticulated needs. Researchers embed directly in the user experience.
Ethnographies excel when:
- Deep insight into “unsaid” user behaviors, motivations, and pain points is needed.
- Directly observing users interacting in real environments provides more authenticity than interviews.
- Longer-term immersion reveals ingrained habits, rituals, and relationships.
- Users cannot fully or accurately articulate their own behaviors and motivations.
Tips for effective ethnographies:
- Clearly define the cultural/environmental scope for observations. Get necessary access.
- Utilize fly-on-the-wall observation techniques to avoid disrupting natural behaviors.
- Take comprehensive notes on user activities, interactions, tools, and environmental factors.
- Look for patterns in activities, conversations, rituals, artifacts, and relationships.
- Balance active observation with informal interview discussions to add context.
- Keep the human perspective; focus on empathy not just data gathering.
5. User Testing
User testing involves directly observing representative users interact with a product or prototype to identify usability issues and collect feedback. Participants work through realistic scenarios while researchers analyze successes, pain points, emotions, and verbal commentary.
User testing shines when:
- Feedback is needed on whether designs meet user expectations and needs.
- Identifying issues in workflows, navigation, learnability, and comprehension is important.
- Directly observing user behavior provides more reliable insights than what they self-report.
- Testing with iterations is built into the product development process.
Tips for effective user testing:
- Develop realistic usage scenarios and test scripts tailored to key research questions. Avoid bias.
- Recruit users matching target demographics and familiarity with the product domain.
- Set up comfortable testing spaces and moderation that put users at ease.
- Record sessions to capture insights from body language, tones, facial expressions etc.
- Analyze results for trends and outliers in behaviors, problems, emotions. Focus on learning.
- Iterate on solutions based on insights. Retest with new users to validate improvements.
The think-aloud protocol method asks users to continuously verbalize their thoughts, feelings, and opinions while completing tasks with a product or prototype. Researchers observe and listen as users express in-the-moment reactions.
Think-aloud testing is ideal when:
- Understanding users’ in-the-moment decision making process and emotional responses is invaluable.
- Insights into points of confusion, frustration, delight can rapidly inform design iterations.
- Users can competently complete tasks while articulating their thinking concurrently.
- Limited time is available compared to extensive ethnographies or diary studies.
Effective think-aloud tips include:
- Provide clear instructions to share thoughts continuously throughout the session. Reassure users.
- Use open-ended prompts like “Tell me what you’re thinking” to encourage articulation without leading.
- Avoid interfering with the user’s process so their commentary feels natural.
- Have users complete realistic, task-based scenarios representative of the product experience.
- Capture direct quotes and time stamp compelling reactions to inform development priorities.
Think-aloud testing efficiently provides a window into users’ in-the-moment perceptions and decision making during hands-on product experiences
Applications Of Qualitative Research
Early product development stages:
Qualitative user research is invaluable in the early ideation and discovery phases of product development when the problem space is still being explored.
Methods like interviews, ethnographies, and diary studies help researchers deeply understand user needs even before product ideas exist. Qualitative data informs initial user personas, journeys, and use cases so product concepts address real user problems.
Early qualitative insights ensure the end solution resonates with user contexts, attitudes, behaviors and motivations. This upfront user-centricity pays dividends across the entire product lifecycle.
Understanding user needs:
Qualitative techniques directly engage with end users to reveal not just what they do, but why they do it. Immersive interviews unveil users’ unstated needs because researchers can ask follow-up questions on the spot.
Observational studies capture nuanced behaviors that users themselves may not consciously realize or find important to mention. The qualitative emphasis on unlocking the “why” behind user actions is crucial for identifying needs that statistics alone miss. The human-centered discoveries spark innovation opportunities.
The flexible and exploratory nature of qualitative research allows people to openly share the frustrations, anxieties, and pain points they experience.
Their candid words and emotions convey the meaning behind problems far better than numbers alone. For example, ethnographies and diaries may reveal users’ biggest problems stem not from one specific functionality issue but from misaligned workflows overall.
Qualitative techniques dig into the impacts of problems. The human perspectives guide better solutions.
Understanding context of use:
Well-designed qualitative studies meet users in their natural environments and daily lives. This enables researchers to observe how products and services integrate within existing ecosystems, habits, relationships, and workflows.
Key contextual insights are revealed that surveys alone could miss. For example, home interviews may show a smart speaker’s role in family dynamics. Contextual understanding ensures products fit seamlessly into users’ worlds.
Benefits Of Qualitative Research
Gaining deep insights:
Qualitative techniques like long-form interviews, think-aloud protocol, and diary studies uncover not just surface-level behaviors and preferences, but the deeper meaning, motivations and emotions behind users’ actions.
Asking probing open-ended questions during in-depth conversations reveals nuanced perspectives on needs, thought processes, pain points, and ecosystems.
Immersive ethnographic observation also provides a holistic view of ingrained user habits and contexts. The richness of these qualitative findings informs truly human-centered innovation opportunities in a way quantitative data alone cannot.
Understanding user emotions:
Qualitative research effectively captures the wide range of emotional aspects of the user experience. Through ethnographic observation, researchers directly see moments of delight during usability testing or frustration while completing a task.
Diary studies provide outlets for users to express perceptions in their own words over time.
In interviews, asking follow-up questions on reactions and feelings provides more color than rating scales. This emotional intelligence helps designers move beyond functional requirements to empathetically address felt needs like enjoyment, trust, accomplishment, and belonging.
Exploring new ideas:
The flexible, conversational nature of qualitative research facilitates creative ideation.
Interactive sessions like focus groups or participatory design workshops allow people to organically share, build on, and iterate on ideas together.
Moderators can probe concepts through clarifying, non-leading questions to draw out nuance and have participants riff on each other’s thoughts. This process efficiently fosters new directions and uncovers latent needs that traditional surveys may never have identified.
Uncovering underlying reasons:
Asking “why” is fundamental to qualitative inquiry. Researchers go beyond documenting surface patterns to uncover the deeper motivations, contextual influences, ingrained habits, and thought processes driving user behaviours.
Observations combined with follow-up interviews provide well-rounded explanations for why people act as they do. For example, apparent routines may be based on social norms versus personal preferences. Qualitative findings explain behavior in a way quantitative data alone often cannot.
Approaches like ethnography facilitate stepping into the user’s shoes to immerse in their worldview.
Two-way dialogue through long-form interviews allows candid exchange as fellow humans, not detached research subjects. Insights derived from conversations and observations in real-world contexts inspire greater empathy among researchers for users’ needs, frustrations, delights, and realities. Teams feel connected to the people they aim to understand and serve.
Quantitative User Research
Quantitative research seeks to quantify user behaviors, preferences, and attitudes through numerical and statistical analysis. It emphasizes objective measurements and large sample sizes to uncover insights that can be generalized to the broader population.
Key characteristics of quantitative research include:
Quantitative studies utilize highly structured data collection methods like surveys, structured user observation, and user metrics tracking. Surveys rely on closed-ended questions with predefined response options. Observation uses systematic checklists to tally predefined behaviors. This standardization allows mathematical analysis across all participants.
Numerical and statistical analysis:
The numerical data gathered through quantitative research is analyzed using statistics, aggregates, regressions, and predictive modeling to draw conclusions. Researchers can analyze response frequencies, statistical relationships between variables, segmentation analyses, and predictive models based on the quantitative data.
Large representative samples:
Quantitative research prioritizes large sample sizes that aim to be representative of the target population. For surveys, sufficient sample sizes are determined using power analyses to ensure findings are generalizable. Some common samples can be in the hundreds to thousands. This is in contrast to smaller qualitative samples aimed at diving deep into individual experiences.
Surveys and questionnaires rely heavily on numerical rating scales to quantify subjective attributes like satisfaction, ease-of-use, urgency, importance etc. Respondents rank options or choose numbers that correspond to stances. This assigns discrete values for comparison and statistical testing.
Quantitative research focuses on uncovering factual, observable and measurable truths about user behaviors, needs or perceptions. There is less emphasis on gathering subjective viewpoints, contexts, and detailed narratives which are hallmarks of qualitative research. The goal is objective, generalizable insights.
Common Quantitative Research Methods
1. Online Surveys
Online surveys involve asking a sample of users to respond to a standardized set of questions delivered through web forms or email. Surveys gather self-reported data on attitudes, preferences, needs and behaviors that can be statistically analyzed.
Online surveys are ideal when:
- A large sample size is needed to gain representative insights from a population.
- Standardized, quantitative data on usages, perceptions, features etc. is desired.
- Users have the literacy level to understand and thoughtfully complete surveys.
- Stakeholders want quantitative metrics, benchmarks and models based on user data.
Effective online survey tips:
- Limit survey length and design clear, focused questions to maintain engagement.
- Structure questions and response options to enable statistical analysis for trends and relationships.
- Use rating scales to quantify subjective attributes like satisfaction, urgency, importance etc.
- Write simple, unambiguous statements users can assess consistently. Avoid leading or loaded language.
- Test surveys before deployment to refine questions and ensure technical functionality.
- Analyze results with statistics and visualizations to glean actionable, user-centered insights.
2. Usability Benchmarking
Usability benchmarking involves assessing a product’s ease-of-use against quantified performance standards and metrics. Researchers conduct structured usability tests to gather performance data that is compared to benchmarks.
Usability benchmarking is ideal when:
- Quantitative goals exist for critical usability metrics like task completion rate, errors, time-on-task, perceived ease-of-use.
- Comparing usability data to other products, previous versions, or industry standards is desired.
- There is a focus on improving usability measured through standardized objectives versus qualitative insights.
Effective usability benchmarking tips:
- Identify key usage tasks and scenarios that align to business goals to standardize testing.
- Leverage established usability metrics like System Usability Scale (SUS) to enable benchmarking.
- Conduct structured tests with representative users on targeted tasks.
- Analyze metrics using statistical methods to surface enhancements tied to benchmarks.
- Set incremental usability goals and continue testing post-launch to drive improvements.
Analytics involves collecting and analyzing usage data from products to uncover patterns, metrics, and insights about real customer behaviors. Sources like web analytics, app metrics, and usage logs are common.
Analytics excel when:
- Objective data on how customers are actually using a product is needed to optimize features and workflows.
- Large volumes of real customer usage data are available for analysis.
- Revealing segments based on behavioral differences can inform personalized experiences.
- Improving key performance indicators and quantifying impact is a priority.
Effective analytics tips:
- Identify key questions and metrics aligned to business goals to focus analysis. Common metrics are conversions, engagement, retention etc.
- Leverage tools like Google Analytics to collect event and behavioral data at scale.
- Analyze trends, run statistical tests, and build models to surface insights from noise.
- Make insights actionable by tying to opportunities like improving at-risk customer retention.
- Continuously analyze data over time and across updates to optimize ongoing enhancements.
Applications of Quantitative Research
Quantitative studies provide statistically robust methods to validate assumptions and confirm hypotheses related to user behaviors or preferences.
After initial qualitative research like interviews raise theories about user needs or pain points, quantitative experiments can verify if those hypotheses hold true at a larger scale.
For example, A/B testing can validate if a new checkout flow improves conversion rates as hypothesized based on earlier usability studies. Statistical validation boosts confidence that recommended changes will have the expected impact on business goals.
The large, representative sample sizes and standardized methodologies in quantitative studies allow findings to be generalized to the full target population with known confidence intervals.
Proper sampling methods ensure data reflects the intended audience demographics, attitudes, and behaviours.
If certain usability benchmarks hold true across hundreds of participants, they are assumed to apply to similar users across that segment. This enables product improvements to be made for broad groups based on generalizable data.
Tracking granular changes:
Quantitative data enables even subtle changes over time, iterative tweaks, or segmented differences to be precisely tracked using consistent metrics.
Longitudinal surveys can pinpoint if customer satisfaction trends upward or downward month-to-month based on new features.
Web analytics continuously monitor click-through rates over years to optimize paths. Controlled A/B tests discern the isolated impact of iterative enhancements. The reliability of quantitative metrics ensures changes are spotted quickly.
Quantifying problem severity:
Statistical analysis in quantitative research can accurately define the frequency and severity of user problems.
For example, an eye-tracking study might uncover 60% of users miss a key navigation element. Surveys can determine what percentage of customers are highly frustrated by unclear documentation.
Quantifying the scope and business impact of issues in this way allows product teams to confidently prioritize the problems with greatest value to solve first.
Benefits of Quantitative Research
Quantifying user behaviours:
Quantitative methods like analytics, surveys, and usability metrics capture concrete, observable data on how users interact with products.
Usage metrics quantify engagement levels, conversion rates, task completion times, feature adoption, and more. The numerical data enables statistical analysis to uncover trends, model outcomes, and optimize products based on revealed behaviours versus subjective hunches. Quantification also facilitates benchmarking and goal-setting.
Validating hypotheses rigorously:
Quantitative experiments like A/B tests and controlled usability studies allow assumptions and theories about user behaviors to be validated with statistical rigour.
Significant results provide confidence that patterns are real and not due to chance alone. Teams can test hypotheses raised in past qualitative research to prevent high-risk decisions based on false premises. Statistical validation lends credibility to recommended changes expected to impact key metrics.
Precisely tracking granular trends:
The consistent, standardized metrics in quantitative studies powerfully track usage trends over time, across releases, and between user segments. For example, longitudinal surveys can monitor how satisfaction ratings shift month-to-month based on new features.
Web analytics uncover how click-through rates trend up or down over years as needs evolve. Controlled tests isolate the impact of each iteration. Quantitative data spots subtle changes.
Quantitative data provides concrete, measurable evidence of user behaviours, needs, and pain points for informed decision-making.
Metrics on usage, conversions, completion rates, satisfaction, and more enable teams to identify and prioritize issues based on representative data versus hunches. Leaders can justify decisions using statistical significance, projected optimization gains, and benchmark comparisons.
The focus on objective, observable metrics can reduce biases that may inadvertently influence qualitative findings.
Proper sampling methods, significance testing, and controlled experiments also minimize distortions from individual perspectives. While no research is assumption-free, quantitative techniques substantially limit bias through rigorous design and large sample sizes.
Comparing Qualitative and Quantitative User Research
Here is a comparison of qualitative and quantitative user research in a table format:
|AREA||QUALITATIVE RESEARCH||QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH|
|Approach||Exploratory, open-ended||Structured, statistical|
|Focus||Uncovering the “why” and “how” behind user behaviours and motivations||Quantifying and measuring “what” users do|
|Methods||Ethnography, interviews, focus groups, usability studies||Surveys, analytics, controlled experiments, metrics|
|Sample Size||Smaller (individuals to dozens)||Larger (hundreds to thousands)|
|Data Analysis||Interpretation of non-numerical data like text, audio, video||Statistical analysis of numerical data|
|Outcomes||Rich behavioral and contextual insights||Generalizable benchmarks, metrics, models|
|Appropriateness||Excellent early in product development to explore needs||Validates concepts and compares solutions quantitatively|
When to Use Each Method
When to use qualitative research:
- Early in the product development lifecycle during the fuzzy front-end stages. Open-ended qualitative research is critical for discovering user needs, pain points, and behaviors when the problems are unclear. Qualitative data provides the rich contextual insights required to guide initial solution ideation and design before quantifying anything. Methods like in-depth interviews and contextual inquiries reveal pain points that pure quantitative data often overlooks.
- When research questions are ambiguous, expansive, or nuanced at the start. Qualitative methods can flexibly follow where the data leads to uncover unexpected themes. The fluid approach adapts to capture unforeseen insights, especially on subjective topics like emotions and motivations that require deep probing. Qualitative approaches excel at understanding complex “why” and “how” aspects behind behaviors.
- If seeking highly vivid, detailed narratives of user motivations, ecosystems, thought processes, and needs. Qualitative data maintains all the situational nuance and color intact, not condensed statistically. User stories and perspectives come through with empathy and emotion versus sterile numbers. This level of detail informs truly human-centered solutions.
- During discovery of new market opportunities, expanding into new segments, or exploringnew capabilities with many unknowns. Flexible qualitative digging uncovers fresh territories before attempting to quantify anything. Fuzzy front-end exploration is suited to qualitative exploration.
When to use quantitative research:
- To validate assumptions, theories, and qualitative insights at scale using statistical rigor. Quantitative data provides the confidence that patterns seen are significant and not just anecdotal findings. Surveys, controlled experiments, and metrics test hypotheses raised during qualitative discovery. The statistics offer credibility.
- If research questions aim to precisely quantify target audience behaviors, attitudes, and preferences. Quantitative methods objectively measure “what” users do without room for fuzzy interpretation. The numerical data acts as a precise compass for decision-making.
- When clear metrics and benchmarks are required to set optimization goals, compare design solutions, and tightly track progress. Quantitative data delivers concrete KPIs to orient teams and chart enhancement impact.
- To isolate the precise impact of changes over time or between design solutions by tracking standardized metrics. Controlled A/B tests discern what improvements unequivocally moved key metrics versus speculation.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What is the main difference between qualitative and quantitative user research?
The main difference is that qualitative research aims to uncover the “why” behind user behaviors through subjective, non-numerical data like interviews and observations. Quantitative research focuses on quantifying the “what” through objective, numerical data like metrics and statistics.
2. Can qualitative and quantitative user research be used together?
Absolutely. Many researchers use a mixed methods approach that combines both qualitative and quantitative techniques to get comprehensive insights. Qualitative research can uncover problems to quantify, while quantitative testing can validate qualitative theories.
3. How do I choose between qualitative and quantitative user research?
Choose based on your current product stage, questions, timeline, and resources. Qualitative research is best for exploratory discovery, while quantitative confirms hypotheses. Use qualitative first, then quantitative or a mix of both.
4. What are some common tools for conducting qualitative and quantitative user research?
Qualitative tools include interviews, focus groups, surveys, user testing and more. Quantitative tools include web analytics, App store metrics, usability metrics, controlled experiments and surveys.
5. What are the limitations of qualitative and quantitative user research?
Qualitative findings are not statistically representative. Quantitative data lacks rich behavioral details. Using both offsets the weaknesses.
Is your CRO programme delivering the impact you hoped for?
Benchmark your CRO now for immediate, free report packed with ACTIONABLE insights you and your team can implement today to increase conversion.
Takes only two minutes
If your CRO programme is not delivering the highest ROI of all of your marketing spend, then we should talk.